Multiple Secured Parties: Risks
Complications with Multiple Secured Parties: Part 3 – Risks Again, most people do not appreciate the potential complications involved when a search reveals multiple secured parties on a single financing …
Complications with Multiple Secured Parties: Part 3 – Risks Again, most people do not appreciate the potential complications involved when a search reveals multiple secured parties on a single financing …
Complications with Multiple Secured Parties: Part 2 – Amendments Most people do not appreciate the potential complications involved when a search reveals multiple secured parties on a single financing statement. …
Complications with Multiple Secured Parties: Part 1 – Terminations Most people do not appreciate the potential complications involved when a search reveals multiple secured parties on a single financing statement. …
“Lapsed” or “Unlapsed,” and Perhaps “Active” or “Inactive,” but not “Terminated.”
The UCC’s recordkeeping requirement for filing offices (e.g., state Secretaries of State) is that the filing office must maintain records until at least one year after a financing statement would lapse.
Why allow a PMSI to disturb the relatively straightforward order-of- filing priority scheme? There are at least two reasons: Facilitating seller financing Limiting the power of existing secured parties. Sometimes …
If a secured party has a perfected security interest in purchasemoney collateral, the secured party should be able to acquire purchasemoney priority – and take advantage of an exception to the general rules of priority – by satisfying the technical requirements of § 9-324.