As digital assets become increasingly integrated into corporate finance strategies, understanding the tax implications of cryptocurrency holdings is essential for compliance and strategic planning. Corporations engaging with cryptocurrencies—whether through direct investment, transactional use, or treasury management—must navigate a complex and evolving tax landscape shaped by federal regulations, IRS guidance, and international standards.
Classification and Tax Treatment
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) classifies cryptocurrencies as property, not currency, for federal tax purposes (IRS, 2025). This designation subjects corporate crypto holdings to capital gains tax rules rather than foreign exchange or commodity treatment. Consequently, any sale, exchange, or disposition of cryptocurrency triggers a taxable event, requiring corporations to calculate gains or losses based on the asset’s fair market value at the time of the transaction (Bloomberg Tax, 2025).
Capital Gains and Losses
Corporations must distinguish between short-term and long-term capital gains depending on the holding period. Assets held for one year or less are taxed at ordinary income rates, while those held longer may qualify for lower long-term capital gains rates (IRS, 2025). Losses from crypto transactions can offset gains, reducing overall tax liability. However, corporations must maintain detailed records to substantiate these claims.
Operational Income and Payments
When corporations receive cryptocurrency as payment for goods or services, the transaction is treated as ordinary income. The fair market value of the crypto at the time of receipt must be reported as revenue, and any subsequent appreciation or depreciation is treated as a capital gain or loss upon sale (Schwab, 2024). This dual-layered tax treatment complicates accounting and necessitates robust tracking systems.
Treasury Strategies and Valuation
Some corporations, such as MicroStrategy and Metaplanet, have adopted crypto treasury strategies, allocating significant portions of their reserves to digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum (Chen, 2025). These strategies can yield substantial returns but also introduce volatility and valuation challenges. Accurate valuation is critical for financial reporting and tax compliance, especially given the IRS’s requirement to report gross proceeds and cost basis on Form 1099-DA starting in 2025 (IRS, 2025).
Reporting Requirements and Compliance
Corporations must answer the digital asset question on federal tax returns and report all relevant transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, and income derived from staking or mining (IRS, 2025). Brokers facilitating crypto transactions are also subject to new reporting obligations under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, including the issuance of Form 1099-DA for digital asset sales (Bloomberg Tax, 2025).
International and State Considerations
Globally, tax treatment of crypto varies. For example, Japan offers favorable tax treatment for shareholders exposed to crypto via corporate stock holdings (Chen, 2025). In the United States, state-level guidance is inconsistent; some states treat crypto as cash for sales tax purposes, while others exempt it entirely (Bloomberg Tax, 2025).
Conclusion
Cryptocurrency holdings present both opportunities and challenges for corporations. While they offer diversification and potential financial upside, they also demand rigorous compliance with tax regulations. As the IRS and global authorities refine their frameworks, corporations must stay informed and consult tax professionals to ensure accurate reporting and strategic alignment.
References
Bloomberg Tax. (2025). Taxation of cryptocurrency and other digital assets. Retrieved from [10]
Chen, C. (2025, July 19). From Bitcoin to Ethereum: The rise of crypto treasury strategies. Forbes. Retrieved from [1]
Internal Revenue Service. (2025). Digital assets. Retrieved from [9]
Schwab. (2024, November 13). Cryptocurrencies and taxes: What you should know. Retrieved from [11]
Please note: Any opinions discussed in this article belong solely to the author, Hunter Ayers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Capitol Lien.
About the Author
Hunter Ayers has been a valued member of Capitol Lien since May 2021, contributing thoughtfully and reliably across a range of projects throughout his four-year tenure. Known for his analytical mindset and collaborative spirit, he approaches challenges with clarity, precision, and a strong sense of purpose.
Hunter is currently pursuing dual majors in Management Information Systems and Business Analytics, along with a minor in Management, at the University of Minnesota Duluth. His academic focus reflects a deep interest in the intersection of technology, data, and organizational strategy.
About Capitol Lien
Capitol Lien is your trusted partner for due diligence and risk mitigation solutions, delivering fast and accurate research nationwide. We specialize in UCC Search and Filing, Tax Liens, Judgment Liens, Good Standing, Bankruptcy, and Real Estate Research, providing critical insights to help businesses, financial institutions, and legal professionals make informed decisions.
With 35 years of experience, our expert team delivers thorough and timely reports tailored to your specific needs, helping you navigate complex transactions with confidence.
At Capitol Lien, we prioritize real-time accuracy, expert analysis, and exceptional service, ensuring you get the information you need—when you need it.
Visit capitollien.com to learn more about how we can support your due diligence process!